EW-3: Runoff Quality
1-3 point
Goal
Improve water quality of stormwater runoff leaving the roadway Right-of-Way (ROW)
Requirements
- Develop a stormwater management plan for the site using stormwater best
management practices (BMPs) for water quality treatment. Explicitly state the goals
of this plan and how performance will be measured.
- Use low-impact development (LID) BMPs to the maximum extent feasible as
determined in Project Requirement PR-8 by a licensed professional.
- Compute the 90th percentile average annual rainfall event postâconstruction runoff
volumes (Vtotal) for two areas as follows:
- Vrunoff: the total pollution generating surface (PGS) area of the project ROW
- Vrun-on: The total PGS area outside the ROW that may generate untreated
stormwater which runs into the ROW BMPs, if any.
- Vtotal = Vrunoff + Vrun-on
- Vtreated = Vrunoff-treated + Vrun-on-treated
- % of Total Post-Construction Runoff Volume Treated = Vtreated/Vtotal x 100%
- Compute a weighted average of volumes treated for the total volume managed
in the project where more than one BMP is used.
- Provide treatment for a desired percentage of the total computed runoff volume
for either of the areas noted in Table EW-3.1. List the types, manufacturers,
treatment levels, and total volumes treated in BMPs..
- Demonstrate that the planned BMPs meet the following quality criteria:
- BMPs reduce sediment loads to total suspended solids (TSS) concentrations of
25 mg/L or less, as an indicator of overall treatment level. See Table EW-3.2.
- BMPs conform to all applicable minimum water quality standards for all
effluent leaving the ROW set by the governing jurisdiction for contaminants,
such as heavy metals, hydrocarbons, pathogens, water temperature and
turbidity. State the minimum requirements, including critical erosive flow
criteria, and provide referenced document or policy.

Documentation
A copy of the executive summary of the project drainage design report that includes, at minimum, the following:
- Short narrative that addresses each of the credit requirements.
As needed, supporting calculations for runoff areas, runoff volume (output from any rainfall modeling software
used is adequate), and treatment levels may be requested.
Public commentary on credit EW-3
In the example problem, it would be helpful to clearly state what surfaces are defined as "New Impervious" vs "PGIS". If the side walk and bike lanes are not attached to the street and one would not expect to find a vehicle driving on them, they are not PGIS. However if the bike lane is attached to the road, since a car could drive on there that would be considered "PGIS". When I try to estimate the totals, I do not get the same values at the example problem. (ie. 0.16 miles x 44 ft wide does not = 0.99 AC PGIS).
Also the statement below appears to indicate that oil control is (enhanced treatment) and it is not. However, if you look at page 3-15 of the HRM, oil control is required at intersections that have greater than 25,000 vehicles stopping to cross 15,000 vehicles or vice verse. I would just indicate the intersection is not considered a high use intersection and therefore oil control is not required. .4.
Concentration testing information for the tree box filters used was provided by the Washington Department of Ecology (2010). No expected effluent values exceed the stated 25 mg/L TSS limit (Sustainable Sites, 2009) or special Washington State standards for removal of heavy metals or oils (enhanced treatment).
Greenroads Manual Review []
You must be logged in to the Greenroads website in order to post comments on the manual. If you already have an account, please log in using the green login box in the upper right portion of the screen. If you do not have an account but wish to comment, please sign up for one here.
Thanks,
The Greenroads Team